EU wants code of conduct for nanotech research (2008, Feb)

February 20, 2008 - No Responses

EU wants code of conduct for nanotech research

11.02.2008 - 09:17 CET | By Leigh Phillips

The European Commission has adopted a voluntary code of conduct in the field of nanotechnology research hoping to establish some guidelines in this fast-growing but little-understood research area.

Although in many quarters still thought of as an industry out of science-fiction, nanotechnology - the manufacture of products on an atomic and molecular scale - is already very much up and running, with so-called first-generation nano innovations already on the market in such products as cosmetics, sunscreens, paints, packaging, clothing and varnishes.

Technology has advanced well ahead of public policy, and the commission hopes to correct this with its “Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research”.

“Knowledge gaps remain about the impact of these technologies on human health and the environment, as well as issues relating to ethics and the respect of fundamental rights,” said the commission in a statement on Friday (8 February).

It is urging member states to adopt the code.

The code covers seven general principles including sustainability, precaution, inclusiveness and accountability, with the commission hoping universities, research institutes and companies, will adhere to ensure the safe development and use of nanotechnologies.

“Nanotechnologies and nanosciences could very well be the next revolution in enabling technologies,” said EU research commissioner Janez Potočnik.

“The code of conduct is a tool … that will make it very simple to address the legitimate concerns that can arise regarding nanotechnologies,” he added.

The code requests that nano research activities be comprehensible to the public, performed in a transparent manner, accountable, safe and sustainable and not threatening to the environment.

The code also requests that such research be conducted in accordance with the precautionary principle. This says that when there is the possibility that nanotechnology applications may harm human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken - even if some cause and effect relationships are not yet fully established scientifically.

Because of the technology’s potential effects on the environment, green groups have in recent years begun campaigns calling for greater transparency in the research process and an adherence to this principle.

Environmentalists largely welcomed Friday’s announcement.

“We do like a lot of the ideas that are in the code of conduct,” said Aleksandra Kordecka, a campaigner with Friends of the Earth Europe, “but it really doesn’t go far enough, as it’s only a voluntary code. It needs to be mandatory.”

Ms Kordecka also argues that nano research should be directed more toward applications that are of genuine benefit to everyone, such as nanotechnologies that can neutralise pollution or help with the battle against climate change, rather than “unnecessary” but profitable commercial applications.

“Do we really need research into socks that don’t stink?” she said, referring to one potential commercial nano innovation.

Nanotechnology Engagement Group (UK)

February 1, 2008 - No Responses

http://www.involve.org.uk/neg

Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG)

The government has learnt that to ensure public support for emerging technologies the governance of the underpinning science must be transparent.

Involving the public in the research and development of new science and technologies helps ensure that their social, ethical, health and environmental impacts are considered. It contributes to improving people’s knowledge about new fields of research, and may build public confidence in the institutions that regulate it.

The Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG) has been established to stimulate new thinking and practice around public engagement on nanotechnologies. It aims to capture the learning from existing nanotechnology engagement projects and make recommendations for future research and practice in this field.

The NEG is funded by the Office of Science and Innovation’s (OSI) Sciencewise programme.

Reports Events 

More information about the NEG For more information or to draw the NEG’s attention to any nanotechnology engagement projects that you know of, please contact Karin Gavelin on 020 76320 123.

Soft Machines

December 2, 2007 - No Responses

The blog by Richard Jones with the same title as his book:

http://www.softmachines.org/wordpress/

Nanodialogues by DEMOS

December 2, 2007 - No Responses

they write…

Four experiments in upstream public engagement

Nanotechnology - the science of small things - promises to be one of the defining technologies of the 21st Century. But what will it mean for society and the environment? And how can public engagement in deciding the direction of research be moved ‘upstream’?”